Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Lapeer County Democratic Party 1st Annual Rock Music Festival and Pig Roast

Lapeer County Democratic Party 1st Annual Rock Music Festival and Pig Roast

Sunday Morning Talk Show Circuit

Is anybody as tired of seeing Dick Cheney on TV as I am? Truth be told I thought we saw

the last of Dick Cheney in January yet there he is, every Sunday morning, bloviating, on how

unsafe we have all become, now that no one’s being tortured. Give it a break Dick, Obama said

he wanted to move forward, (thats code for, your not going to jail) man up already.

If you feel the need to talk about something meaningful on Sunday Morning. Why don’t you

explain to the American people how you let a 5′-1” North Korean Dictator, get his hands on a

nuclear devise? Now that would be some interesting television.

Kim Jon Ill didn’t just wake up one day and pull a nuke out of his shorts. No, he built it

while you and your buddy the “Crawford Crusader” spent 8 long years deciding who you were

and weren’t going to talk to? Does this remind anyone else of an elementary school

playground?

Maybe you should have been paying a little less attention to torturing Afghani’s and a little

more attention to protecting us from rouge states with nuclear aspirations.

So, word to the wise Dick, you have absolutely no chance of getting a Democratic

administration to torture prisoners. None, what so ever. Now I know what you were thinking, if

Barack tortures too, they won’t try both of us for war crimes , and that would have been a

beautiful plan, if we were all still in 6th grade. But were not Dick and you need to go home now

cause it’s big people time.

Enhanced Interrogation Technique’s

Enhanced Interrogation Technique’s

Why is there a debate about whether enhanced interrogation is torture? Do the people who

engaged in these activities really think that if they call it something else it will indeed be

something else? Or do they believe that we as a culture, have become so insipidly simple

minded that merely altering the name is all that is necessary to legally engage in such

activities? Words as it turns out are not only tools to communicate thoughts and ideas but also a

way to provide cover for those of us who don’t wish to (for whatever reason) act or react with

civility.

I remember a story I heard as a child and although I can’t recite it exactly (it was a long time

ago) I won’t lose the meaning, it went kind of like this.

God calls the Archangel Micheal before him to reveal his latest creation, Man. God says to

Micheal, behold Man is cleaver and I need to conceal the ultimate truth from him until he is

ready. Micheal contemplates this for a while and finally says we should put it at the bottom of

the deepest ocean. God quickly dismisses this as to achievable for man. Micheal counters, we

should put it on the top of the tallest mountain. God pictures this in his mind for a moment but

dismisses it also. Then Micheal said, we should hide it inside of him, because only when man

truly knows himself would he have access to the truth.

Deep down underneath the masks, the houses, the cars and the clothes each and every one of

us needs to be honest with ourselves. The real question here isn’t, were people tortured, the

question here is what are they hiding behind the words? A rose by any other name, is just a

rose.

Auto pension trouble on horizon?

Auto pension trouble on horizon?

$77-billion shortfall could spell trouble for younger retirees’ benefits

BY SUSAN TOMPOR
FREE PRESS PERSONAL FINANCE COLUMNIST

Detroit got handed one more ugly number Wednesday to slap us into the reality that we must rethink our futures. Sheet metal no longer can craft a cushy retirement. Nor can rubber, tires or seat cushions, apparently.

The entire auto industry — which would include the Detroit Three, as well as other auto manufacturers and auto suppliers that offer defined-benefit pension plans — is looking at a combined $77 billion in underfunded pension liabilities, based on the estimates of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

We do not want to alarm anyone. So make no mistake, the rug is not being pulled out from under most auto retirees. Many older retirees at General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC face no change in their pension payout.

But it is essential for others to know that about 45% of those underfunded pension benefits — or about $35 billion — would not be guaranteed in the event that all those plans in the auto industry would have to be terminated.

Who’d get hurt? Often it would be retirees in their late 40s, 50s or early 60s if their plans are terminated when they’re young and turned over to the PBGC, the agency that protects basic pension benefits. If the agency took over, those younger retirees would see caps on pension benefits. Go to www.pbgc.gov.

Early retirement deals could be on shaky ground

For years, the auto industry has tried to cut costs by enticing employees in their late 40s or 50s to take early retirement buyouts.

But those early retirement deals that offer full retirement benefits at a young age could be on shaky ground in the years ahead. The risks are real, if not immediate.

The PBGC said on Wednesday that it would cover only about $42 billion of an estimated $77 billion in underfunded benefits in the auto industry in the event that all the plans would be terminated. That’s because Congress put a limit on how much money the federal agency would pay out to younger retirees.

So could $35 billion in retirement benefits in the auto industry really be lost?

First, realize that the PBGC estimate covers 46 companies in the auto industry, including the Detroit Three, other car companies, auto suppliers, and rubber and tire companies.

No one is expecting all of those companies to terminate their plans and turn over the pensions to the agency tomorrow — or even in the near future.

Vince Snowbarger, acting director of the PBGC, noted in an interview earlier this month that Chrysler LLC and General Motors Corp. both are not expected to terminate their pension plans.

A warning for retirees

The latest numbers, though, do serve as a warning that it’s possible that some retirees down the line won’t get as much money as they expect.

“It says: People in the auto industry may have been promised more than can be delivered,” said Douglas Elliott, economic studies fellow at the Brookings Institution, a nonprofit public policy organization based in Washington, D.C.

Elliott points out that a pension fund can run out of money if its investments go bad and the employer becomes bankrupt and stops making new contributions.

All you have to do is go back a few decades. Elliott said the bankruptcies of the automakers Packard and Studebaker in the 1960s left a large number of employees with substantially reduced pensions when they retired.

Until 1974, there was little or no protection for pensions.

That same year, Congress passed the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, the foundation for the current pension insurance program.

Yet when a plan is turned over to the PBGC, there are strict limits on what can be paid out to younger retirees. Older retirees see more generous limits.

Now that several auto-related companies are in trouble, some younger retirees may not get everything that was promised in the long run.

For example, someone who is 50 years old today cannot collect a $25,000-a-year or $50,000-a-year pension if the PBGC doles out the dough right now for his or her old pension plan.

The PBGC limit in 2009 would be $1,575 a month — or $18,900 a year — for someone who is 50 years old and retired.

For 2009, the maximum guaranteed amount is $4,500 per month — or $54,000 a year — for workers who begin receiving payments from PBGC at age 65.

The specific limits are based on when the PBGC takes over the plan, as well as how old you are if you are retired when the PBGC takes over that plan.

Elliott sees a real risk even if the pension plans for GM, Chrysler and others are not terminated now.

It’s possible, he said, some auto industry firms could have to re-enter bankruptcy even if they emerge from one bankruptcy reorganization. Who knows what happens in three or four years?

Stock market not a fast fix

While the stock market losses in the past year did hurt pension fund investments, a dramatic increase in stock prices alone won’t solve all the pension troubles.

“The most critical factor in people looking at the risk is the financial health of their company,” said Jeffrey Speicher, a spokesman for the PBGC.

Speicher said the PBGC has been involved with 93 new bankruptcies in different industries since Oct. 1, 2008. A plan will not necessarily be terminated if a company files for bankruptcy.

On Wednesday, the PBGC reported that it posted a $33.5-billion deficit for the first half of fiscal year 2009.

Based on unaudited financial numbers as of March 31, the deficit represents an increase over fiscal year 2008’s $11-billion shortfall, and is the largest in the agency’s 35-year history.

“The increase in the PBGC’s deficit is driven primarily by a drop in interest rates and by plan terminations, not by investment losses,” Snowbarger said in written testimony for the Senate Special Committee on Aging.

The PBGC has stressed that it has sufficient funds to meet its benefit obligations for many years because benefits are paid monthly over the lifetimes of beneficiaries, not as lump sums.

Over the long run, some such as Elliott, predict that the PBGC itself will need a bailout.

Contact SUSAN TOMPOR: 313-222-8876 or stompor@freepress.com

Additional Facts


Karl Rove Inspirational?

Michelle Mc Manus, Republican running for Secretary of State, had this to say today: “Inspirational words from Karl Rove at last night’s Heritage Foundation dinner in Dearborn.” I think we both find his words inspirational, but for different reasons.

Being that he was Bush’s brain, he should be ashamed of where he led this country, and for anyone to draw inspiration from him, with that track record . . . (I don’t know what to say).

This is what we face in 2010.

Dear Mr. Steele

“Let’s be honest, Senator Specter didn’t leave the GOP based on principles of any kind. He left to further his personal political interests because he knew that he was going to lose a Republican primary due to his left-wing voting record.” - GOP Chairman Michael Steele

Well, the ethics behind Specter’s switch aside, Mr. Steele seems to have contradicted himself in his two-sentence quote.  It seems that deciding to leave a party based on your voting record is exactly the same thing as doing so based on your principles, since, as a Senator, you typically vote on your principles.  If he left because of his “left-wing” voting record, then it stands to reason that he left, if only indirectly, because of his “left-wing” principles.

But it was a valiant try, Chairman.